prelo
Prelo vs Ghost

Prelo vs Ghost

Both open source with a polished editor and an optional business model on top. The split is shape: Ghost is a publishing product; Prelo is a CMS for whatever site your client needs.

TL;DR

For a blog, newsletter or paid membership publication, pick Ghost — subscriptions and email are built in and excellent. For agency client sites — services, portfolios, restaurants, anything with custom types and a bespoke frontend — Prelo fits where Ghost’s fixed post/page model doesn’t.

Ghost
Prelo
Built for
Publishing: blogs, newsletters, memberships
Client websites of any shape
Content model
Posts + pages, fixed
Custom types, one schema file
Frontend
Ghost themes (Handlebars)
Your framework — headless by default
Memberships
Built in, first-class
Not built in
Open source
✓ (+ Ghost(Pro) hosting)
✓ · MIT
AI writing
Admin API
Agent-first API + MCP
Pick Ghost when
The product is a publication with subscribers
You want paid memberships without integration work
A standard theme is fine — no bespoke frontend needed
Pick Prelo when
The site needs custom types: services, projects, menus, listings
The frontend is bespoke, built by you or your agent
The client edits everything, not just posts

Migrating

Ghost’s JSON export covers posts, pages and tags. An agent replays it through Prelo’s content API in minutes; members and subscriptions don’t transfer — that’s Ghost’s home turf.

Frequently asked questions

Can Prelo do newsletters?+

Not natively. If email is the product, use Ghost; if the site just needs a blog, Prelo’s posts cover it.

Why does Ghost rank as the closest analog?+

Same open-source-plus-optional-hosting model, same “focused alternative to WordPress” positioning — aimed at publishers where Prelo aims at agencies.

More comparisons: WordPress alternative · Best headless CMS

Ready to hand over your next site?

Free and open source. One command, and the client gets a login instead of a Loom.

Start a project — free