prelo
Prelo vs Sanity

Prelo vs Sanity

Both are API-first with a real editing studio. The split is ownership: Sanity is a SaaS content platform; Prelo is a container the client runs on their own domain and bill.

TL;DR

Sanity is the stronger pure content platform — realtime collaboration, GROQ, portable text. Prelo wins the agency handover case: no vendor account for the client, no per-seat bill, one container that holds studio, API and database on their infrastructure.

Sanity
Prelo
Hosting
SaaS — Sanity’s cloud
Self-hosted — one container
Your data
Content Lake, vendor account
A SQLite file you own
Editor
Sanity Studio — dev-configured
Prelo studio — works day one
Pricing
Per-seat + usage tiers
$0 · MIT
AI writing
APIs + schemas you wire up
Agent-first content API + MCP
Handover
Client inherits a Sanity account + bill
Client gets a login on their domain
Pick Sanity when
Genuinely complex structured content across many surfaces
Realtime multi-editor collaboration is a daily need
An enterprise team wants a managed platform with SLAs
Pick Prelo when
Client sites where the client must own everything after handover
No appetite for a per-seat vendor bill at year two
The builder is an AI agent working in your repo

Migrating

Sanity’s export is clean NDJSON. Your agent maps document types to a Prelo schema file and replays documents through the content API. Portable text converts to Prelo’s block content.

Frequently asked questions

Is GROQ available?+

No — Prelo’s API is REST with typed filters. Less power than GROQ, much less to learn; agents handle it natively.

What about Sanity’s free tier?+

Generous for solo projects, but client work hits seat and dataset limits — and the bill lands on whoever owns the account: usually you.

More comparisons: Best headless CMS · Prelo vs Strapi

Ready to hand over your next site?

Free and open source. One command, and the client gets a login instead of a Loom.

Start a project — free